Tono Many activists, Lutzerath, a small abandoned village in Germany, symbolizes the nightmare of the global energy crisis. Activists have blocked demolition of the site for months after the country’s energy minister, Robert Habeck, allowed a utility to mine lignite, the dirtiest form of coal, under his graffiti-covered home. Hundreds of police officers shrugged off fireworks being fired at them as a giant excavator loomed, dragging protesters from their posts. Now the village is deserted; its last buildings are gone.Just a little bit Lutz (cables and roads) left for the bucket wheel to devour.
Your browser does not support
In a panic, politicians in Europe and Asia keep turning on the lights, are reopening coal mines, keeping polluting power plants running, and signing deals to import liquefied natural gas (liquified natural gas). State-owned oil majors such as United Arab Emiratesof Adnock Saudi Arabia and Saudi Aramco are allocating hundreds of billions of dollars to ramp up production, while private energy companies are raking in huge profits. Many governments encourage the use of these dirty fuels by subsidizing energy use to help citizens survive the winter.
The reality, however, is that the return of brown fuel is just a sideplot in a larger story. By making coal, gas, and oil more scarce and expensive—despite recent declines, prices remain well above long-term averages—Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has given renewable energy (mostly domestically produced) a significant boost. significant strategic and economic advantages. Indeed, even though Mr Harbeck supported coal mining last year, the Green Party politician has plans to expand solar and wind power, including in the windy Rhineland in Lutzerath. Officials around the world are raising renewable energy targets and allocating huge sums of money to finance the expansion.
This complexity makes it difficult to discern whether turmoil in energy markets is facilitating or hindering the green transition. To assess the overall situation, economist A range of factors were studied, including fossil fuel consumption, energy efficiency and renewable energy deployment. Our findings suggest that the austerity caused by the war in Ukraine may have actually accelerated the transition by a staggering five to ten years.
As the battle of Lutzerath suggests, the main reason for the panic is that the world is burning more coal these days. Before the war, demand for the fuel appeared to have peaked in 2013, but is now in a long-term decline. However, consumption rose by 1.2% last year, surpassing 8 billion tonnes for the first time in history. Sky-high gas prices have prompted utilities in Europe and parts of Asia, notably Japan and South Korea, to use more of the stuff. Politicians have extended the life of coal plants, reopened closed plants and lifted production caps. This has led to a scramble for supplies – exacerbated by Europe’s ban on Russian imports. Production in China and India rises by 8% and 11%, respectively, in 2022, pushing world production to a record high.
International Energy Agency (International Energy Agency), an official forecaster predicts coal demand will remain high until 2025 (although it warns that forecasting is particularly difficult in current market conditions).Europe will get less gas from Russia and the world liquified natural gas Supply is likely to remain tight, meaning coal will remain the EU’s fallback option. India’s appetite is likely to grow, increasing demand. But rising renewable energy use will dampen that growth — and beyond 2025, coal’s fortunes look bleak.new liquified natural gas Projects in the U.S., Qatar and elsewhere are set to start, relieving pressure on gas markets.
At the same time, the existing global oil and gas production capacity is close to saturation. Russia cannot easily redirect its gas exports; its oil rigs, short of personnel and parts, may soon produce less than they do now.While energy-poor countries have been busy signing long-term import deals liquified natural gas, This will force them to import fossil fuels for decades to come, but still in modest amounts. Hydrocarbon companies are enjoying fat profits, but investment in new projects is falling. Such investment is still well below where it was a decade ago, and the dollar now appears to be worth less: capital spending per barrel of output, a measure of exploration and production costs, has risen by 30% since 2017. Demand continues to rise while slowly rising, and may even fall, and supply should keep oil and gas prices high.
High prices have already led consumers and businesses to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels.Last year, the world economy became 2% less energy intensive – measured by the amount of energy used to produce a unit of product gross domestic product– Fastest rate of improvement in ten years. Efforts to reduce consumption have been most pronounced in Europe, where unusually mild temperatures have helped in recent months. Warmer weather and greater energy efficiency mean the continent uses 6-8% less electricity this winter than the previous year, according to consultancy McKinsey. All over the world, capital is being mobilized on a massive scale to make economies more frugal. Governments, households and businesses combined spent $560 billion on energy efficiency last year. The money has been spent primarily on two technologies: electric vehicles and heat pumps. Sales of the former will nearly double in 2021 and 2022.
firework signal
But efficiency can only make so much of a difference. People are also looking for alternative energy sources, especially in Europe. From December 2021 to October 2022, contract prices for wind and solar PV projects in Africa are on average 77% lower than wholesale electricity prices. €257 per MWh (Megawatth), the average price in Germany in December, a typical solar power plant takes less than three years to be profitable, Megawatth, Average spot price from 2000 to 2022. Globally, installations of rooftop solar panels, which are used by homes and businesses to cut bills, halved last year. record 128weight of onshore wind projects also broke ground, up 35% from the previous year.
These indicators capture only a fraction of the activity that took place after the war, as it can take many years to select sites, obtain permits and design large wind or solar farms. A more representative — and even more encouraging — metric is the amount of money flowing to new projects. Global capital spending on wind and solar assets rose from $357 billion to $490 billion last year, surpassing investment in new and existing oil and gas wells for the first time. Consultancy Rystad Energy estimates that investment will continue to increase over the next two years.this International Energy Agency By 2025, China is expected to build renewable energy generation capacity capable of supplying 1,000 terawatt-hours, equivalent to the total power generation of Japan today. More funding is also being earmarked for emerging technologies such as green hydrogen, which could help decarbonize activities that are difficult to electrify.
At the same time, the fuel crunch has boosted clean energy policies in the world’s largest economy. The U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (Irish Republican Army) sets aside $369bn for green tech subsidies; European Commission plans to give at least €250bn ($270bn) to cleantech firms and decides to double target ahead of schedule European UnionInstalled solar capacity from 2030 to 2025. The country’s ambitions have also been oversized. In July, Germany raised its 2030 target for the share of renewable energy in electricity generation from 65% to 80%. China’s Energy 14th Five-Year Plan, released in June, set for the first time a target for the share of renewable energy in electricity generation (33% by 2025). China’s provincial governments are also increasingly offering green incentives.
Much of the money will be spent inefficiently.this Irish Republican Army Comes with plenty of “Made in the USA” stipulations. In response, the European Commission is likely to relax state aid rules. This industrial policy will exacerbate an existing problem: cost inflation. The war in Russia has driven up the price of metals such as aluminium, copper and steel, all of which are vital for cables, turbines and panels. While some commodity prices are now falling, costs are being pushed up by higher interest rates instead – a particular problem for developers of solar and wind farms, which require more upfront capital than regular power plants . High freight and electricity costs, as well as staff shortages, added to the costs.Namit Sharma of McKinsey estimates that by 2030 European Union To meet its goals, the number of people developing, building and operating green factories must quadruple.
This all means that developers at the top of the green supply chain don’t make much money. Several offshore wind giants have recently announced that they will be taking huge write-downs on projects. In theory, developers could pass higher costs on to consumers by bidding higher on potential projects. But in practice, stingy new state rules and auction designs make it difficult.this winter European Union A windfall tax on renewable energy generators and a cap on wholesale electricity prices effectively caps returns. Germany’s new offshore wind tendering system, dubbed “negative bidding”, pits bidders against each other on how much they are willing to pay to run the project. Endless licensing disputes further diluted returns.
On the other hand, big spending plans in the less protectionist US and Europe will have a bigger impact.But even in this fallen world, they still matter — enough is enough, forecasters consulted economist This is estimated to help accelerate the energy transition by five to ten years. A surge in investment and tougher targets should create a lot of renewable energy generation capacity. all in all, International Energy Agency Global renewable energy capacity expected to increase by 2,400weight Between 2022 and 2027, it is equivalent to the entire installed capacity of China today. That’s nearly 30 percent higher than the agency’s 2021 forecast released before the war. Renewables will account for 90% of the growth in global electricity generation during this period.
With the development of green energy and the reduction of fossil fuel use, the global economy is now expected to emit much less carbon dioxide than predicted 12 months ago. Part of the reason is that emissions won’t be as high as they would be without the war. Second&p Data firm Global reckons the amount of energy generated from burning energy will peak in 2028 – a level the world would still be in by 2032 if Vladimir Putin hadn’t invaded Ukraine.
earth, wind and fire
It may also be more pronounced once the descent begins. Rystad’s Artem Abramov said he had predicted emissions from fossil fuel use would stabilize into the late 2020s and possibly into the 2030s, but would now begin to decline from 2025. That’s because the rush toward fossil fuels is unlikely to last long or be large enough to offset the boom in renewables. Although recent progress has failed to limit global warming to 1.5°C by 2100, models suggest that these changes make a 2°C rise more attainable.
To illustrate the dynamics that are happening now, go back to Germany. Lutzerath’s fate is decided by a political exchange. The deal means two coal-fired power plants scheduled to close in 2022 will instead run until March 2024. In return, however, two larger plants will be decommissioned in 2030 – eight years earlier than originally planned. ■
For more expert analysis of breaking economic, financial and market news, sign up for Money Talks, our subscriber-only weekly newsletter.
Plus, for more coverage on climate change, sign up for our bi-weekly subscriber newsletter Climate Matters, or visit our Climate Change Hub.
